Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 7641 - 7660 of 28,828
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2020, 6:59 am by Julie Totten
Specifically, the DOL explained that: While a positive COVID test is sufficient to qualify for PUA eligibility, a qualifying diagnosis does not require a positive test. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:11 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
See information on that here.Revenue Procedure 2020-20 (April 21, 2020)Follow @crubincrubin [read post]
  Notably, these payments are “subject to available funding” and HHS does not provide the amount that will be made available. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:07 pm by Jillian de Chavez-Lau
  For example, with respect to the seventh criterion (an individual who was scheduled to commence employment but does not have a job as a direct result of the COVID-19 emergency), UIPL 16-20 explains that this includes an individual who does not have a job “because the employer with whom the individual was scheduled to commence employment has rescinded the job offer as a direct result of the COVID-19 public health emergency. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 12:42 pm by Thalia Kruger
In this case, if the arbitration agreement does not reveal a Seat then the Courts of the place where the cause of action arose will be considered as the Juridical Seat of the arbitration. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 10:27 am by Dawn Mertineit
On Monday, April 20, SCOTUS granted a petition for certiorari in a case that may finally provide clarity to a question that has troubled defense attorneys and trade secrets practitioners alike for many years: what does it mean to “exceed authorized access” under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:33 am by Jason C. Gavejian and Maya Atrakchi
On March 20, 2020 the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) published a Declaratory Ruling confirming that the COVID-19 pandemic is an “emergency” that qualifies for the TCPA’s “emergency purposes” exception. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 6:06 am by John Elwood
(rescheduled before the November 1, 2019, and November 8, 2019, conferences; relisted after the November 15, 2019, November 22, 2019, December 6, 2019, December 13, 2019, January 10, January 17, January 24, February 21, February 28, March 6, March 20, March 27, April 3 and April 17 conferences)   United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:32 pm by Peta Willoughby and Matt Wichlinski
If you require advice or assistance with managing fatigue issues, please contact us. [1] New South Wales Parliamentary Debates Second Reading speech to the Workers Compensation Legislation Amendment Bill 2012 (NSW) and Safety, Return to Work and Support Board Bill 2012 (NSW), 20 June 2012, 13188. [2] Namoi Cotton Co-Operative Ltd v Stephen Easterman (as administrator of the estate of Zara Lee Easterman) [2015] NSWWCCPD 29. [3] See, e.g., Kerle v. [read post]
While states such as Texas have begun easing restrictions put in place to stop the spread of COVID-19, the World Health Organization Chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stated on April 20 that “easing restrictions is not the end of the epidemic in any country. [read post]