Search for: "High v State" Results 7641 - 7660 of 35,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:48 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and James Kim
  While the CFPB’s jurisdiction over small business finance is limited, this is not necessarily true of other enforcement authorities, such as state AGs or regulators. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:24 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York’s standards for defamation are very high, and are set forth in Steinhilber v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:24 am by Eric Turkewitz
New York’s standards for defamation are very high, and are set forth in Steinhilber v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 2:58 am
When it comes to the validity of European patents, the national courts of the EPC member states apply the same law as the EPO. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
IPSO took six months to rule on the matter, during which time a case officer became so concerned about Hindley’s mental state that she sent her contact details for the Samaritans. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:43 am by DONALD SCARINCI
However, a subsequent joint rule limited the section’s geographic scope to the United States and the high seas. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
This was the issue for phone book directories created by automation processes in the case of  Telstra Corp v Phone Directories, as well as datasheets created by the operation of computer programs in Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 8:09 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
This was the issue for phone book directories created by automation processes in the case of  Telstra Corp v Phone Directories, as well as datasheets created by the operation of computer programs in Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd. [read post]