Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2011, 1:55 pm
We're pleased as punch to dwell, and mostly practice, in a jurisdiction that simply doesn't allow design defect claims against an FDA-approved drug – and even if it did would require an alternative feasible design – not that the product wasn’t aspirin, or some other different product. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Diddy wins TTAB summary judgment over IDIDDY for headphones due to non-use (TTABlog) When Rodney Dangerfield meets the naked trade mark licence – 9th Circuit Freecyclesunnyvale v The Freecycle Network (IPKat) TTAB reverses refusal to register Weldebrau beer bottle design, finding it inherently distinctive (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability: Must SERVICE CREW be disclaimed for retail store services? [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Applying this analysis, the Judge’s rulings on qualified privilege were correct. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:03 pm
In part, that’s unavoidable; we’ll never know enough about the world around us to be confident that we’re making the best choices. [read post]
David Skeel’s Excellent Book, and Comparing Discretion in the Financial Crisis and National Security
7 Jan 2011, 8:29 pm
It is not discretion of the kind exercised by a bankruptcy judge — gap filling and interpretive and discretion existing only for defined issues, existing yes, but within a tightly bound box. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 4:23 pm
Thus, if “exports minus imports” is the measure by which we judge the benefits of trade, then America should shun trade entirely. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:28 pm
David got a chance to limit the reach of Hammad, to some extent, when by designation he sat on the circuit in In re Simels. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 10:43 am
As we reported recently on our Marijuana Lawyer Blog, many of the more than 400 dispensaries ordered to close by Los Angeles' ordinance this summer are now busy re-opening after a judge's ruling late last month, which prohibited the city from taking enforcement action. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
For instance, Turner’s website also urged readers to murder “illegal aliens”: “We’re going to have to start killing these people. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:50 am
We’re sure he’ll get over it. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
If you're lucky, you can start over -- but judges may also bar filers from re-filing within a certain time, if the mistake was serious. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 12:40 pm
They're more results-oriented policy assessments designed to persuade the already-persuaded. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:51 am
Bureau of Prisons Program Statement 5100.08, Inmate Security Designation and Custody. 2. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 4:04 am
" As much as I would like to maintain the good reputation of the legal profession with the standard litany about the duty to be a "zealous advocate," there’s nothing about being a zealous advocate which requires someone to lie, and I knew that these were, in fact, lies, pure and simple, lies designed to frustrate the judicial process by misleading the judge and thereby prolonging the case and introducing frivolous diversions from the real facts of the case. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:33 am
The previous appeal was a nullity, and so res judicata didn’t bar consideration of the same issues he’d raised the first time around. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
In re Sears Brands, LLC, Serial No. 77558337 (December 20, 2010) [not precedential]Examining Attorney Paul A. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:11 am
A copy of Judge Seeborg’s opinion can be found here. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:42 pm
But no way you're going to issue this one right before Christmas. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
Medical Device: MEDICAL DEVICE SUPPLIER ISN'T 'HEALTH CARE PROVIDER', Orthopedic Res. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:38 am
Finding USPS Blue Mailbox Famous, TTAB Sustains 2(d) and 2(a) OppositionSection 2(a) - scandalous:TTAB Reverses 2(a) Scandalousness Refusal of "BIG EFFIN GARAGE" for Music WebsiteTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is "AUDIOTURD & Design" Scandalous Under Section 2(a)? [read post]
