Search for: "John Does 1, 2, 3"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 7,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
[they] conspired together on other activities in furtherance of their conspiracy including: (1)bringing, without investigation sufficient to establish that the allegations and factual contentiontherein have evidentiary support, lawsuits against persons who are not specifically known to haveinfringed copyrights, including persons who are deceased, disabled or who lack knowledge ofhow to use computers or download files from the internet; (2) making false and unsupportedallegations… [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:38 am
We previously sketched an outline of the typical recording industry lawsuit: "(1) the mass lawsuit against a large number of 'John Does'; (2) the "ex parte" order of discovery; and (3) the subpoenas demanding the names and addresses of the 'John Does'. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:25 am
Call toll free at 1-866-332-3567. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
The petition would have been due Aug. 7, but city officials said Monday that they would ask Chief Justice John G. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
And does John Nicols think Nancy Pelosi is not disregarding her oath of office by not using the Spending Power to check the excesses of President Bush? [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 6:12 pm
Both the FCC and Congress are confronted with multiple demands, including: (1) Congress's own budgetary needs, (2) the needs of public safety officials, (3) the demands of existing communications companies, and (4) the demands of companies that would like to be new entrants in the communications industry. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
However, with respect to 1 and 2 the time line doesn't fit. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:52 pm
I'd like to get your input first if I could, as to: (1) why Atkins does not appear in the docket, and (2) the results of the IT search your office was undertaking so that cases sealed in the past would be available. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 3:52 am
I had Jury Duty today that was a complete waste of 5 1/2 hours of my life.Juror No. 10 is shocked: The lawyers on both sides took turns dismissing potential jurors. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 11:49 am
§ 35-38-1-6. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 2:31 am
On information and belief, Defendants installed the display, which had neverbefore been displayed on public property, before the courthouse opened in 1997 and have maintained it at taxpayer expense since that time.See prior postings on this case 1, 2, 3.Thanks to the First Amendment Center for the lead to the online documents. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
(Aug. 1, 2005)67. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 7:07 am
Jun 28, 2007) (NO. 6:05CV330) Judge: Leonard Davis / John LoveHolding: Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement GRANTEDPlaintiff filed objections to Judge Love's report and recommendation that the defendant's motion for summary judgment of noninfringement be granted, primarily arguing that: (1) an incorrect standard was applied in granting summary judgment of non-infringement, (2) the Report overlooks competent evidence that defeats summary judgment of… [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
John D. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Rev. 3 (forthcoming 2008). [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:47 am
John Deere Co. of Kansas City, 383 U.S. 1 (1966), factors still control an obviousness inquiry. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:53 pm
Finally, critics say the punishment does not fit the crime: Mr. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
§ 1981a(b)(1) because (1) only one of the employees who discriminated against Parker was a "managerial agent" of the defendant, (2) this single employee did not act with the requisite malice or reckless indifference to justify punitive damages, and (3) in any event, the defendant had made a good faith effort to comply with Title VII, thereby insulating itself from punitive damages liability. [read post]
30 Jun 2007, 5:16 am
ARMY" Logo, Sustains 2(d) Refusal Precedential No. 28: "CLUB PALMS MVP" Confusingly Similar to "MVP" for Casino Services, TTAB Rules Precedential No. 27: Board Finds Family of "HOG" Marks, Sustains 2(d) Opposition to "DIRT HAWG" and "WATER HAWG" for Wet and Dry VacuumsSection 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness: "EQUITY RESIDENCE CLUB" Merely Descriptive of Real Estate Development Services, Says TTAB… [read post]
