Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 156,926
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2016, 3:29 pm
Trades Council v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 10:57 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Since Chimel - many other cases have broadened this holding including the case of United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
You cannot sue state court judges, and their clerks who simply apply the law. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:27 am
The United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bullcoming v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 9:03 am
Yesterday, in Kansas v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Without the marriage equality established by the Obergefell decision, the issue of same-sex marriage would revert back to state law and, in Georgia, the state statutes (as well as the state constitution) prohibit same-sex marriage. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:31 am
On Monday, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Georgia v. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 4:10 am
In the case, Washington state's Supreme Court held that, as applied, the religious and non-profit exemption to the state's anti-discrimination law may be unconstitutional. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:39 am
United States, this Court held that part of a federal law's definition of "violent felony" was impermissibly vague. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 11:26 am
Georgia courts commonly treat the annotations as strong evidence of the law of the state. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 7:17 am
by James Toomey On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 10:50 am
Bowen School of Law is proud to present a symposium on the significance of Cooper v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Keller et al. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:06 pm
—Grossman Law Offices The post Tyran V. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:37 am
One other twist: the court permanently dismissed the federal claims but allowed the plaintiffs to refile the state law claims (wrongful death and NIED) in state court because those may be subject to a different proximate cause standard than the federal ATA law. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 7:30 am
The State of Connecticut has in place certain laws that allow the state to charge inmates for the cost of incarceration and even the use of its public defenders. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 11:11 am
In Jeffrey Chiara v. [read post]
