Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 7641 - 7660
of 21,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:06 pm
While the judgment in Independent Newspapers v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 1:38 pm
They aren't because the Court created the option, unforeseen by Congress, of not expanding Medicaid in NFIB v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:14 pm
Mark Tushnet called this an “easy out. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
Stockade Companies, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
In United States EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am
[Correction: An earlier version of this post stated that Kennedy’s opinion in Murr v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am
Cover Letter In a one-page letter to Mark Rumold of EFF, Rodney Patton, Senior Counsel in the Civil Division, explains that the accompanying files represent “the first batch of documents” in response to EFF’s FOIA request seeking as-of-yet-undisclosed FISC or FISC-R orders and opinions. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:01 am
Walsh v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am
Mark Walsh provides a “view” from the courtroom for this blog. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
In pertinent part, the complaint stated that the defendant possessed nine white pills marked with “M 36”. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 2:49 am
In pertinent part, the complaint stated that the defendant possessed nine white pills marked with “M 36”. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
While noting that it is for the referring court to make a determination in the specific case at hand, the AG stated that to this end "the referring court should carry out an overall assessment, taking into account the graphic representation and any descriptions filed at the time of application for registration, as well as other material relevant to identifying the essential characteristics of the contested mark, where applicable. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am
Supreme Court’s decision this week in Matal v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 9:20 am
Murr v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
Steve Vladeck outlined his critiques of Justice Kennedy’s analysis of Bivens damages, as set forth in the majority opinion in Ziglar v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 8:52 am
Matal v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
In fact, in the cross-motions for summary judgment, the claimants stated that the use of a trade mark as a verb, i.e. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
Salim v. [read post]
