Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 12,300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In University of Colorado v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:38 pm
On the other hand, the prosecution presented clear and convincing evidence to support the defendant's classification as a level three offender, in the form of documentary evidence consisting of the presentence report, and the case summary and risk assessment instrument prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders based on People v Grimmet, People v Overman, People v Burgess and People v Moore. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 1:57 pm
Lurking through cases that offered heightened scrutiny outside the normal tiered rubric was a lingering fear of the spirit Lochner, in this body Williamson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Erickson and Washington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:52 am
Fisher v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 5:42 am
Vincent v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
But whilst sympathetic on a human level I do think they’re wrong. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:37 pm
Scorpio Music S.A. et al v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Oakland Circuit Judge Colleen O'Brien relied on the now-reversed Court of Appeals decision in the People v Koon case, which ruled that even drivers with medical marijuana cards violated the motor vehicle code when driving with THC in their bloodstream. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:17 pm
In Burch v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Bollinger and Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 7:50 am
Williams State v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:29 pm
The defendant supports his position on the rulings made in Kent v United States and People v Drummond. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am
Schuette v. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:11 pm
This is a four-fold increase in the level of criminality over that of non-bullies. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:11 pm
This is a four-fold increase in the level of criminality over that of non-bullies. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 4:15 pm
It was established in People v Daguiar that minor traffic congestion does not rise to the level of a condition which endangers the safety or health of a considerable number of persons, which is an essential element of Penal Law § 240.45(1). [read post]
