Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 7641 - 7660 of 9,855
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
As he well knows, such terms have very precise meaning under US law, and by that metric - one that's extremely favorable for American companies, by the way - only a small minority of Chinese imports into the United States are "unfairly traded. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:54 am by Steve Hall
The United States Supreme Court overturned Mr. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
[Update] On 6 May 2011 Mr Justice Tugendhat gave judgment in the case of Bacon v Automattic [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) – a Norwich Pharmacal application in which he held that the operators of WordPress and Wikipedia could be served with the order in the United States by Email. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:51 am by Adam Goodman
” - United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
”[v] Moreover, and “absent acceptable resolution, disputes would fester … [and] likely threaten the very survival of the community. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:47 am by Robert Tanha
Altman's vulnerable medical state and age meant that her chances for reemployment into a comparable position were very low, and justified an extended period of notice. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:08 am by Laura Davis, AFPD, FDSET
Judges will remind you unpublished opinions have limited precedential value, but even they cite them from time to time (as Judge White recently did on page 4 of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:08 am by Kedar Bhatia
United States). 92% of paid petitions that were granted and scheduled for argument during OT10 appeared on our “Petitions to Watch” list (61 out of 66). [read post]
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Robert Peet Skinner, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States of America at Athens; and The President of the Hellenic Republic: Mr. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:58 am by Moria Miller
”DiPompeo ran the Law Review successfully, including publishing a comment, "Federal Hate Crime Laws and United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 9:03 am by Daniel Thies - Guest
The most striking feature of Tuesday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Here is Kim’s guest post:    This week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Erica P. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 10:06 pm by Daniel Thies - Guest
The most striking feature of Tuesday’s opinion in United States v. [read post]