Search for: "State v Richards" Results 7641 - 7660 of 9,002
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1995); see also State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 12:28 pm
Horn v Huddle centers around claims (.pdf) by Richard Horn, formerly a special agent with the Drug Enforcement Administration, that employees for the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency planted listening devices in his home in 1992, while he was stationed in Burma (now Myanmar). [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm by Kedar
The fact that I’m reading Between Law & Politics, Richard Pacelle’s fascinating look into the world of the Solicitor General, didn’t hurt either. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
Today was the deadline for all amici supporting Harris Associates to file their briefs in the Supreme Court case of Jones v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
I am always a bit humbled when a victim of food poisoning stands up to the corporations who poisoned them with food – especially food labeled “triple washed” and “ready to eat. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 12:12 pm
In the high profile case between Marc Lemire and Richard Warman, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal has refused to apply s. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which stated that hate messages also affected, …a matter that is communicated by means of a computer or a group of interconnected or related computers, including the Internet… Tribunal chair Athanasios Hadjis said, Since a formal declaration of invalidity [of Section 13(1)] is not a remedy available… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 3:16 pm
Their solution, no surprise, is to resuscitate the “hot news” rule under the 1918 INS v. [read post]
Aug. 28, 2009)(Jefferson) (workers comp claim; deadline for contesting compensability) STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]