Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 8,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Chandler III's carefully reasoned decision in Fisk Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 9:00 am
” The opinion contained little direct reasoning, relying mostly on Freudenberg v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:16 am
State, 2009 Ga. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Like many of these cases, the Deutsche Alt-A case was originally filed in state court, and removed by defendants to federal court. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:54 pm
Once stock has been issued, the certificate generally may be amended or repealed by approval of the board and both the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote and the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of each class of stock entitled to vote. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 2:41 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 3:36 pm
This issue has also been extensively (and fairly convincingly) dealt with by the Bombay High Court in Rolta India Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 8:14 am
Circuit in its FTC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 3:10 pm
By Ethan Ackerman On Dec. 23, 2008, federal District Judge Maxine Chesney issued what the defense attorneys in Hoang v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:39 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 8:48 am
The court in Ticketmaster Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:02 am
Article 2 Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Customs Protection of IPRs 2003, however, goes beyond this obligation and applies to both import and export.Article 30 Foreign Trade Law 2004 is to give the foreign trade department of the State Council the legitimacy to take measures in case of an IP right holder that hinders the licensee from questioning the validity of the IPR involved in the license agreements, conducting forced package license or providing… [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 4:57 am
Relationship to United States Citizens3. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 1:47 am
During trial, you walk up to the podium with this nice, organized looking binder, labeled "State v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:51 pm
A patent holder should know what he owns, and the public should know what he does not. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 1:43 pm
Roosevelt UFSD; grants Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 9 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 Last Act: 01/28/08 SIGNED CHAP.9 10 S6773 ROBACH -- Relates to compensation benefits and other terms and conditions of employment of certain state officers state officers and employees; repealer;appropriation BLURB : Civ Serv. comp benefits Chapter Signed Date Effective Date 10 01/28/2008 provided that the applicable effective date for Parts A through B shall be as specifically set forth… [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
State of Ohio, No.7-3808 (6th Cir. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:34 am
In Hartfield v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:50 am
McKenney v. [read post]
