Search for: "State v. Laws"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 156,771
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2018, 7:39 am
United States, this Court held that part of a federal law's definition of "violent felony" was impermissibly vague. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 7:17 am
by James Toomey On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
The plurality of four refused to revisit the Slaughter-House Cases (1873) or United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 7:30 am
The State of Connecticut has in place certain laws that allow the state to charge inmates for the cost of incarceration and even the use of its public defenders. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:13 pm
Keller et al. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:37 am
One other twist: the court permanently dismissed the federal claims but allowed the plaintiffs to refile the state law claims (wrongful death and NIED) in state court because those may be subject to a different proximate cause standard than the federal ATA law. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:06 pm
—Grossman Law Offices The post Tyran V. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:52 pm
Today, in a 5-4 decision the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Maryland v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 11:11 am
In Jeffrey Chiara v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:06 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:52 am
In Held v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Here, the plaintiff failed to establish that the law firm defendants had an obligation to preserve the case file from the personal injury action or that it was destroyed with a culpable state of mind (see Tanner v Bethpage Union Free Sch. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 12:15 am
Transcript, Strategic Funding Source Holdings LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 7:39 am
First, does United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 5:13 am
See Rosenman Colin Freund Lewis & Cohen v Neuman, 93 AD2d 745, 746 [1st Dept 1983] (account stated established by receiving and retaining bills without any timely objection); Liddle O’Connor, Finkelstein & Robinson v Koppelman, 215 AD2d 204 [1st Dept 1995] (account stated based only on partial payment); Bracken & Margolin, LLP v Schambra, 270 AD2d 221 [2d Dept 2000] (account stated based on retention of invoices without… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 7:40 am
State of New Mexico (Tribal State Compacts)Norton v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:27 am
AstroTel, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:10 pm
[See United States v. [read post]