Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2022, 7:49 am
Salesforce and A.B. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 1:14 pm
In Newell Rubbermaid v. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
In his report the Independent Expert on the effects of foreign debt and other related international financial obligations of States on the full enjoyment of human rights, particularly economic, social and cultural rights, presents guiding principles on human rights impact assessments of economic reforms, which set out the human rights principles and standards that apply to States, international financial institutions and creditors when designing, formulating or… [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 1:32 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:18 am
In Helping Hand Private Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:18 am
In Helping Hand Private Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:16 am
Gustovarac v Croatia App. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 7:02 pm
The unpublished NMCCA opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 3:44 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm
The case that decided the matter is Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 7:32 am
See United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:27 am
The plaintiffs in Seviour-Iloff v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:30 am
") AC31023 - State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:33 am
There is no stated necessity that the need or the risk be significant or substantial. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm
The Supreme Court of Louisiana said no last year in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 9:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
This is going to be brief b/c it's been quite a week here, but interesting things have been brewing.Supreme Court:* 924(c)---United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:22 pm
Grissom v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am
However, my research shows that the Commerce Clause doesn't prevent states from regulating commerce in their states as long as what they do doesn't run counter to federal legislation.Of the three bills I've seen so far (Arizona, Minnesota, and North Dakota), my personal favorite is the language of the Grand Canyon State's version of the bill, which would make it illegal for Apple and Google to "require a developer that is domiciled in this… [read post]
