Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 7641 - 7660 of 11,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am by Charles Fried
  And finally seven Justices voted that the threatened denial of all federal Medicaid funds to states that would not join in the significant expansion of Medicaid eligibility was so coercive as to constitute a form of duress that violated the states’ sovereignty and dignity, as announced in cases such New York v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
Obama, et al. (11-117); National Federation of Independent Business, et al., v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm
” The Miranda rights, named after the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:15 am by Lyle Denniston
The church has been pursuing a lawsuit against the town for more than seven years. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 10:03 am
The district court sentenced him to twenty-seven months of imprisonment, the bottom of the range calculated under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("Guidelines" or "U.S.S.G. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
--The Secretary of State shall make each report submitted under this subsection available to the public on the internet website of the Department of State. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Chandler
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
Amazon.com (Washington State Patent Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Activision - Patent Compliance Group files qui tam action against Activision (Patent Arcade) Google - Inside Google’s first patent trial: Function Media, L.L.C. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:59 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Those seven factors, as loyal blog readers will recall from prior posts, first appeared in the court’s 2016 decision in Glatt v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:38 am by Steven Schwinn - Guest
  In the Court’s most recent foray, in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:37 am by Peter Mahler
Earlier this year, using as a springboard the Maryland intermediate appellate court’s decision in Eastland Food Corp. v Mekhaya, I posted about a topic on which there’s little or no New York law, viz., whether a complaint for minority shareholder oppression stated a valid claim centered on allegations that the directors/majority shareholders, instead of declaring profit distributions for all shareholders, were taking disguised distributions in the form of excessive… [read post]