Search for: "State v. So"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 117,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2013, 4:03 pm
On December 19, a panel of the Ninth Circuit issued a brief order in the long-running Doe v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:21 pm
Murr v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
’” Heading into the oral argument, it would appear that at least three justices view the evidence presented of a conspiracy should be regarded as an accurate record (so much so that they would have upheld the injunction before even hearing argument). [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:20 pm
On June 10, 2013, the United States Supreme Court decided Oxford Health Plans, LLC v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
We are discussing Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:29 am
By following this approach, the United States would align itself to case law in Canada (Balev case – Canadian Supreme Court, see our previous post here), the European Union (Mercredi v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:11 pm
The Court ruled in T.M.H. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:11 pm
The Court ruled in T.M.H. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 9:43 am
They will often fight very hard to have a case removed from state court to federal court if there is an opportunity to do so. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
Finally, some may worry whether, even as it promises a “revolution in the enforcement of international human rights law,” the Court’s interpretation of “erga omnes partes” obligations so as to expand standing may place undue expectations on states &ndas [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:13 am
State, 982 So. 2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008); displaying a weapon or physically touching the person, State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 1:20 pm
EFF recently filed an amicus brief in the Washington case State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:59 pm
Additional Resources: Villaneuva v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:40 pm
CARNIVAL CORPORATION, Defendant.Case No. 11-21697-CIV-UNGARO/TORRESUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA2012 U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
For example, in each of the year’s two blockbuster cases—one expanding gun rights (New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
EcoDisc Technology AG v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 am
To hold otherwise would make the Convention effectively directly enforceable as between private citizens so as to alter their contractual rights and obligations, whereas the purpose of the Convention is to protect citizens from having their rights infringed by the state [41]. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
The AG’s hypothetical complaint would have been based on the state DTPA, so a four part test from Singh v. [read post]
20 Jan 2006, 12:33 pm
The Constitutional right to travel as stated in Shapiro v Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969) may even be implicated. [read post]
