Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Laws" Results 7641 - 7660 of 55,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2008, 10:35 am
  The Supreme Court said something similar in Purcell v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
In New York, possession of a firearm is a criminal act, unless one holds a license to so possess, pursuant to Penal Law § 265.20(a)(3) and Article 400 (see People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232 [2008]; People v Zabar Lynch, 2008 NY Misc LEXIS 4587, 240 NYLJ 15 (July 15, 2008). [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 1:50 am
 I would rather judges apply the law as they see it and save the sound bites for the elected branches. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Law Society of Upper Canada In Groia v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:02 pm by Suzanne Ito
Among them is Matthew Bentley from Michigan who committed his crime when he was 14 years-old, an age when the law deemed him too young to legally drive, smoke or join the military but old enough to be sentenced to die in prison, While the Supreme Court ruled in Graham v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am by Nabiha Syed
Louie, the Court has asked the federal government to weigh in on the constitutionality of Hawaiian laws providing tax exemptions for those classified as “native peoples,” while the issue in Decker v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 11:23 am
Florida dram shop liability laws exist so that those harmed by drunk drivers may collect damages from entities that knowingly served alcohol to minors or people known to be habitually dependent on alcohol. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:00 am by Eric
Related Tertium Quid posts: * Amazon's Merchandising of Its Search Results Doesn't Violate Trademark Law * Buying Keyword Ads on People's Names Doesn't Violate Their Publicity Rights * With Its Australian Court Victory, Google Moves Closer to Legitimizing Keyword Advertising Globally * Yet Another Ruling That Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuits Are Stupid--Louisiana Pacific v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:33 pm by Rory Little
In Ocasio, the question is one of conspiracy law: can a group of people be convicted of conspiring to commit “under color of official right” extortion, when they are agreeing merely to obtain secret kickbacks from one of their own group? [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
Not every law that Congress passes has such a handy guide to interpretation; in fact, very few do. [read post]