Search for: "US v. Givens"
Results 7641 - 7660
of 51,326
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 1:05 pm
Law.com just posted a good article on the follow-on litigation after the Supreme Court’s decision in Intel Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:32 am
[Spence] fit the physical description given by the informant. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 10:56 am
Case citation: Lexmark International Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
The Ninth Circuit began by focusing on the roots of the fair use doctrine. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 2:07 pm
Rubin v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am
King v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
In a judgment given on Monday March 26 ([2012] EWHC 756 (QB)), Bean J decided that he was not. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 7:06 am
”The Board pointed out that, given that both the Copyright Act of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas and the US Copyright Act had been created to give effect to the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, and that they did so in a similar way, the US case law was persuasive on the meaning of section 2(3) of the Copyright Act. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 5:45 pm
In the case of Studio Monitori and Others v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
Suppose further that each side is given three peremptory strikes, and that each side uses its peremptories to aggressively remove people based on their white or minority race, respectively. [read post]
6 May 2009, 11:33 am
They cite the Supreme Court case, U.S. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
It is remarkable that a basic recitation of Washington v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 6:06 am
Wells Fargo & Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:27 pm
Luv N' Care, Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:15 am
Latest case in point: Barker v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 9:43 am
This is the principal question that the Court of Appeal was asked in the case of Toyota Motor Corporation v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:28 am
This is the principal question that the Court of Appeal was asked in the case of Toyota Motor Corporation v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am
Given that finding and clearing a new brand purely from a legal perspective can take months, it is interesting to note that when a Defendant loses an infringement case it will almost certainly be ordered to rebrand within days, weeks at the most. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
So where does that leave us? [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:18 am
This is one of a number of cases that will likely be useful for objectors in fighting bad class settlements. (7) Feder v. [read post]
