Search for: "United States v. California" Results 7641 - 7660 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 9:02 am by Glenn
The case used to illustrate this theme was United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:53 am by Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:53 am by Federalist Society
In an opinion delivered by Justice Ginsburg, the Court held that Daimler cannot be sued in California for injuries allegedly caused by conduct of its Argentinian subsidiary when that conduct took place entirely outside of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:45 am by Ken White
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court overturned a $1.4 million defamation judgment William Hoeper won against Air Wisconsin Airlines. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 6:35 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  This decision out the United States District Court for the Southern District of California becomes one in a growing series of court decisions decertifying automatic meal period deduction class actions due to the lack of common proof. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:21 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
  The United States Supreme Court has also recognized the supremacy of federal law governing aviation safety. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  Instead, the court gave the non-paternity its clear, bright-line intent, an approach for which it found support in a very similar case in California, Jhordan C. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 3:09 pm by Cappetta Law Offices
The United States Court of Appeals was charged with deciding whether CROCS pose a heightened risk of escalator entrapment, thus rendering the footwear defective. [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 8:54 am by Nassiri Law
However, there are other avenues for employment litigation in California and throughout the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Pa- tent No. 7,892,281 (“’281 patent”), appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Central District of California granting summary judgment to Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Edwards Lifesciences LLC, and Edwards Lifesciences (U.S.) [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 5:31 pm
In California, of course, state officials resumed recognizing same-sex marriages following the United States Supreme Court's June 2013 decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
 But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]