Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 7641 - 7660 of 24,127
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2018, 8:56 am by Steven Cohen
Mayberry et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Missouri – June 8th, 2018) involves a civil rights claim under 42 USC section 1983 and 1988. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 5:49 am by Matthew Weybrecht
The Constitution of the United States establishes a unitary executive, vesting all the executive power in the president. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:52 am by Jon Gelman
The New York Court of Appeals unanimously held that the Legislature could permissibly regulate the Fund in this manner under the Contracts Clause, the Takings Clause, and the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 10:13 am by Sherrilyn Ifill
However, the court also stressed that Phillips’ refusal to serve Charlie Craig and David Mullins occurred before the Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right of same-sex couples to marry in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm by Richard A. Epstein
He thus notes that this incident occurred in 2012, before same-sex marriage was legal in Colorado or protected under the equal protection clause to the United States Constitution. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:10 am by Steven Koprince
United States, No. 17-1752C (2018) involved a solicitation for support services at Coast Guard headquarters. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Smith Eibeler LLC
The United States Supreme Court has ruled against a gay couple in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for their wedding in the case Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by NCC Staff
The United States, which made wiretapping by state and federal investigators subject to warrant requirements. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Grayson Clary discussed the split circuit court opinions on the government’s authority to search electronic devices at the border, focusing on the Eleventh Circuit’s May 23 ruling in United States v. [read post]