Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 7661 - 7680 of 9,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 9:25 am by Lyle Denniston
——————- Arguing that publicly subsidized state political candidates in Arizona could be silenced if their access to official funds is cut off now, the state of Arizona urged the Supreme Court on Monday to allow those matching grants to go out as scheduled later this month. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Jeff Gamso
  And locked in place by the Ohio Supreme Court, though sometimes you can go into federal court to prevent the state from trying you again.) [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 7:59 am by John Elwood
(John Elwood) Two apparent relists by the Supreme Court today (there are probably more, but these are the only two I’ve inferred). [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 11:35 pm by Mike
The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, saying the burden was on the defendant to unambiguously claim the right to silence. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Defendant’s statements were properly admitted into evidence.The Michigan Supreme Court declined Defendant's invitation to further review his case. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:13 am
Miranda rights suffer another setback in the United States Supreme Court case of Berghuis v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:42 am by Erin Miller
A recent FindLaw poll finds that the two-thirds of Americans cannot name even one Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 5:19 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Defendant’s statements were properly admitted into evidence.The Michigan Supreme Court declined Defendant's invitation to further review his case. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:32 pm by azatty
In fact, among the panelists (and in attendance for the entire conference) were the Chief Justice of the Nevada Supreme Court, James Hardesty, and the Director the Nevada Department of Corrections, Howard Skolnik. [read post]
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination required police to inform a criminal defendant of the following rights:the right to remain silent; anything that the defendant says can be used against him;the right to the presence of an attorney; and if the defendant cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided to him.Miranda warnings must be given prior to the… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am by Adam Chandler
First, PRNewswire reports the results of a FindLaw poll on public familiarity with the Supreme Court. [read post]