Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 33,829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2021, 4:33 pm
California v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:30 am
LOS ANGELES—The California Air Resources Board must not take any additional steps to implement its planned greenhouse gas emissions cap-and-trade program until the agency completes an adequate environmental analysis of the program, a state court ruled May 20 (Ass’n of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:33 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:33 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:33 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:54 am
If I'm not mistaken, the Ninth Circuit's batting average in California capital cases, once certiorari is granted, is .000.Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 1:32 pm
American University Washington College of Law Program on Information Justice & Intellectual Property PresentsSupreme Court Series:Lexmark International, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
EcoDisc Technology AG v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 9:30 pm
Erwin Chemerinsky, University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Michele Goodwin, University of California, Irvine, have published Civil Liberties in a Pandemic: The Lessons ofHistory in the Cornell Law Review 106 (2021): 815-850Throughout American history, whenever there has been a crisis the response has been a deprivation of rights. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Oppenheimer said he discovered his aerial photograph of the Ronald V. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:15 pm
ASUS Computer Int’l v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 4:15 am
In Domen v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 9:15 am
Oppenheimer said he discovered his aerial photograph of the Ronald V. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:57 am
Yesterday's DJ featured an article by appellate specialist Robert Cooper titled Decision Obfuscates Statutory Writ Petition Filing Deadline, about writs under the California Public Records Act and MinCal Consumer Law Group v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 7:56 am
In the case of Cummins v Superior Court, (2005) 36 Cal 4th 478, the California Supreme Court held that the "Lemon Law" only applies to vehicles that are bought in the state of California. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:40 am
(Vernoff v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:08 pm
[Post by Venkat] Balsam v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 12:26 pm
In Prout v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 7:56 am
The court cites to a California statute restricting limitations of liability clauses that purport to exempt someone from fraud, willful injury, or a violation of law. [read post]
