Search for: "Corporations 1 through 5"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 8,722
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
Walter Richey Professor of Corporate Law at the University of Minnesota Law School. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:51 am
Prescription drugs are invaluable tools in the practice of medicine, used to treat numerous illnesses and diseases. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 10:00 pm
Shareowners’ ten steps are: (1) “Break up financial institutions that are too big to fail"; (2) “Split commercial and investment banking"; (3) “Create a public-option rating agency"; (4) “Restrict investment banks’ and hedge funds’ access to pension and retirement assets without investors’ approval"; (5) “Restrict Wall Street firms from listing as public companies"; (6) “Bring transparency to the… [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:04 am
Featured Doc: Doing Business in Singapore - Top 5 Issues in a Shareholders Agreement What about you? [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
The six seamless tasks are: 1) A redefinition of the mission of the company - and the role of the board of directors and the CEO to create durable value for shareholders and other stakeholders through sustained economic performance, sound risk management and high integrity.The most basic purpose of the corporation is for leaders to find a sound balance between risk-taking (innovation and creativity) and risk-management (financial and operational discipline) and to fuse… [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 2:52 am
§ 707(b)(1). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
FEC, No. 08–205 The Court rules that the government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:21 pm
FEC, No. 08–205 The Court rules that the government may regulate corporate political speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Even prior to the Court's ruling, campaign finance regulation was so shot through with loopholes that individuals and corporations seeking to buy influence in Washington had little difficulty doing so. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:20 am
L. 2009, p. 859, § 1/HB 509. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:20 am
L. 2009, p. 859, § 1/HB 509. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
So I thought in keeping with my oral argument post, I'd offer some corporate first thoughts on the big opinion. 1. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 11:12 am
This post is based on a Latham & Watkins Corporate Governance Commentary by Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:05 am
Decades of campaign finance regulation accomplished very little. 5. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:43 am
The tax credit is worth up to $1 million per state-certified green project, calculated on the base investment costs of the project, for up to a total of $5 million per year. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:15 am
Yet, the number of banks with nonperforming assets that exceed 5 percent of total assets has continued to climb and now exceeds 1,000. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
: 1) It will exert even more disincentive for banks to lend. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:15 am
Some random thoughts. 1) I am not surprised the opinion fell to Justice Kennedy. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:46 pm
Jonathan Adler summarizes the case: The Court held 5–4 that restrictions on independent corporate expenditures in political campaigns are unconstitutional, overruling Austin v. [read post]
