Search for: "FAIR v. THE STATE"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 30,500
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 6:19 am
” United States v Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 755 (1987). [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 5:45 am
In Velarde v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
.* In Dickinson v New York State Unified Court System, 99 AD3d 569, the Appellate Division unanimously confirmed the termination of an employee found guilty of “certain disciplinary charges” that alleged, among other things, incompetency due to excessive absenteeism and lateness. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
.* In Dickinson v New York State Unified Court System, 99 AD3d 569, the Appellate Division unanimously confirmed the termination of an employee found guilty of “certain disciplinary charges” that alleged, among other things, incompetency due to excessive absenteeism and lateness. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 pm
Setting aside the fairness of capping noneconomic damages at $357,210.62 for a case as serious as this one, the real issue is whether the cap applies at all under section (4)(a) above? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:32 pm
Setting aside the fairness of capping noneconomic damages at $357,210.62 for a case as serious as this one, the real issue is whether the cap applies at all under section (4)(a) above? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:23 am
Supreme Court in Penry v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:33 am
Webster v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 6:24 am
Plaintiff is an inmate in state prison in Connecticut. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
But is this outcome Fair Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 12:22 pm
Swahn, Jr. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Incorporation of the Bill of Rights is a cryptic subject.12 There is little consensus on whether Black’s “total incorporation,”13 Frankfurter’s “fundamental fairness and ordered liberty,”14 or Brennan’s “selective incorporation,”15 if any, is correct.16 Concerning the Takings Clause, however, congressional records provide some insight but do not settle the question. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Due to City of Detroit v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:10 pm
In Carsanaro v. [read post]
