Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 37,553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
That could be a decisive turning point in a war that traditional civil rights groups already seem to be losing. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
School Dist. v New York State Pub. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 8:00 am
Congress has had numerous opportunities to state its will. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 8:18 pm
The Federal Circuit is often grouped with the circuits that have interpreted § 2680(c) expansively because that court ruled in Ysasi v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 9:11 pm
Brown, Kilgore v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
Facts: This case (Blevins et al v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
The 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 3:30 am
The 8th District’s decision last week in State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 6:36 pm
New York case law is consistent that in absence of privity, a cause of action may not be maintained for breach of contract (Plaisir v Royal Home Sales, 81 AD3d 799 [2d Dept 2011]; CDJ Builders Corp v Hudson Group Construction, 67 AD3d 720 [2009]; Grinnell v Ultimate Realty, LLC, 38 AD3d 600 [2007]; M. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 12:58 pm
The ruling in State of Ohio v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:01 am
Turner v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 1:16 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am
Walker v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
(Citing Wilson & Wilson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:30 am
In Correa v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:31 am
London Christian Radio Ltd and Anor v Radio Advertising Clearance Centre (RACC) and Secretary of State for Culture – read judgment The High Court has upheld the refusal of the broadcasting regulator to clear an advertisement for transmission on the grounds that it offended the prohibition on political advertising. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 1:25 pm
"); United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 3:41 pm
Wisconsin’s case—Wolf v. [read post]
