Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 2:36 pm
United States limits the application of the third-party doctrine, holding that a warrant is required when an individual “has a legitimate privacy interest in records held by a third party. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 11:09 am
The Second Circuit held that the State Department had acted within its power in issuing the Notice.The decision in City of New York v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
(New York is one of the states that does not require service of the complaint with the summons, a point familiar to me from Murphy Bros. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:14 am
Google YouTube Isn’t a State Actor (DUH)–PragerU v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 5:28 pm
Triantyfyllos Tafas v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:01 pm
” Specifically, the Court held that the Rule: (1) inadequately relies on a handful of studies which compare inapposite state approaches, and, (2) is broader than any previously enacted state rule. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
We suggests that the Court should recognize that the state can be held accountable for collateral over-blocking in circumstances where it is a foreseeable consequence of its actions. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:07 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
This however was not an appropriate case and the Supreme Court held that such jurisdiction should not have been exercised. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
For instance, in Ogden, the Texas Supreme Court held that a letter stating that the borrower's default "may result in acceleration" was ineffective because "[t]he letter gave no clear and unequivocal notice that [the lender] would exercise the option. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:54 am
Answering a certified question from the Second Circuit, the State Court of Appeals holds that a New York City-based company may be held liable under the remedial City and State Human Rights Laws if it denies an out-of-state job applicant a position for discriminatory reasons.The case is Syeed v. [read post]
15 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
But, as the Supreme Court explained in its Moody v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 8:10 am
As previously posted, on July 3, 2012, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued a merit decision in Miller v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 3:41 am
To balance the scales, I’m going to give a belated snap to the prosecutors in State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 2:09 pm
While this case, Anderson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
On January 24, 2011, the United States Supreme Court unanimously held that an employee who alleged he was fired because his fiancé, also an employee, had filed a sex discrimination charge against their mutual employer three weeks prior to his termination, does have standing to assert a Title VII retaliation claim (see Thompson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 5:24 am
Being a reader of the Amsterdam Daily News, which describes itself as "one of New York's largest and most influential Black-owned and operated business institutions" and which has a circulation of about 25,000, is a legitimate ground for exercising a peremptory challenge against an African-American jury panel member, the Second Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 6:24 am
In Arthur v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 5:27 am
Christina Waugh won in State v. [read post]
