Search for: "IN RE THE RULES OF CONTINUING LEGAL"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 15,752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2018, 9:00 pm
In a 1995 case, In re Custody of H.S.H. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:21 am
And depressing as David did what he was supposed to do and they're continuing to put him through the ringer... [read post]
11 May 2020, 2:13 pm
The ICAP Staff Attorney 1 will be supervised by ICAP's Executive Director and Legal Director. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:12 am
As a result, this paragraph has been deleted from this final rule. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:34 am
GILTI, the BEAT, and FDII (to the extent that anyone actually cares about it) have devalued legal advice based on judgment, relative to clients' running lots of scenarios to guide tax planning.E.g., suppose the client is wondering about whether it will face the BEAT this year, rather than escaping it under the so-called 3 percent rule (under which the BEAT doesn't apply if less than 3% of one's deductions are "base erosion tax benefits"). [read post]
23 May 2017, 11:28 pm
The 148th edition of Never Too Late is here to (re)freshen you up. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:43 pm
The defendant applied under r.13.3 of the Civil Procedure Rules to have the judgment set aside. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 am
That requires doctors, not used to following the rules, to change their practices.That also requires claims payers to follow the rules and change their practices too - they are responsible for ensuring ALL records (some may not be "relevant") get reviewed.The Culture change affects everyone, and everyone has to adjust. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:21 pm
He must also rescind all related policies that resulted from these orders and abused the same legal authority. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:49 pm
In particular, the SCOV rejected lawyer’s laches argument—“laches” being one of those legal terms that nobody can pronounce correctly because it floated over to England, and found its way into the common law, as a result of the Norman Conquest. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:58 am
If you're a libertarian aching to claw back Congress's commerce clause authority to pre-New Deal days, this is your opinion. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:41 pm
Morgan ruling, insurers and insureds alike are well advised to take a fresh look at their policy wordings. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:37 am
Supreme Court should repudiate the ruling. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
We will therefore resolve the res judicata question now. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Oregon continues to be the overall leader, with 363 initiatives. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:30 am
The Court is likely to rule on the constitutionality of the UID initiative while commenting on the right to privacy in India. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm
Meanwhile, the parties presented their arguments to the AAA panel by letter, and that panel responded with an "Interim Ruling on Defenses. [read post]
2 May 2017, 10:25 am
When Bush finally stood for re-election 18 months later, the bloom was off his Desert Storm victory, and an economic downturn set him to be swamped by Bill Clinton.While the ruling party carefully studies the horizon for signs of cresting popularity or economic turbulence, the opposition can only try to stay afloat. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 3:54 pm
And under ‘Continuing to occupy during possession proceedings’: Mr X’s s.21 notice to quit was due to expire on 1 July 2014. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 10:25 am
” Generic manufacturers relying on deductibility of these litigation costs will benefit from the ruling. [read post]
