Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 7661 - 7680 of 12,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, the uniformity of political opinion extends as far as the eye can see--and beyond. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 8:02 am by Michael Pines
It can include everything from eyewitness testimony and police reports to medical records and professional opinions. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:10 pm by Administrator
(Read the opinion here, and you can read more about the case here and here.) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:43 am by SHG
They’re there for “justice,” and since they’re told that’s their right as “victims,” there is good reason to anticipate that the voices of victims and the public are going to get louder and more disruptive. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:48 am by SHG
Then again, that’s just, like, his opinion, man. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:05 am by SHG
He runs an opinion program on Fox News, a place where the fundamentals of American justice sometimes fall prey to ideological froth. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 5:21 pm by lawmrh
The Court’s opinion in that case was handed down this past week. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:35 am by Big Tent Democrat
And I think that you're correct that that is the law. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  Now, this piece of Mensingwasn’t a majority opinion (Justice Kennedy did not join this section), but only four justices wanted to apply a positive presumption against preemption of the sort invoked in Arters – and that’s a minority.So, before we even get to the merits, Artershas directly contradicted three controlling Supreme Court opinions – taking an erroneous pro-plaintiff position as to each.Why are we not surprised that the… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Brinna Ludwig
In the majority opinion, Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote that “it is impossible to discriminate against a person for being homosexual or transgender without discriminating against that individual based on sex. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Deanne Sowter
In doing so, she ought not allow her personal opinion on the moral merits of her client’s ends interfere with her representation. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 9:25 am by Eric Goldman
  Medical Justice’s contracts have not been definitively tested in court yet, so we don’t know for sure if they’re legal or not. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 9:18 am by Jonathan Bailey
The amended ruling has removed that portion but emphasized that rightsholders only need subjective, not objective, good faith when filing a notice. 3: ​European Court of Justice Opinion Says Public Wi-Fi Operators Not Liable for Piracy Finally today, Richard Smirke at Billboard reports that The European Court of Justice has filed a preliminary ruling that states operators of public wifi access points can not be held liable for users who commit piracy… [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 8:12 am
Thers misses the point in my opinion. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:24 am by Rumpole
 ACA DAY TWO:In our view Chief Justice Roberts voted to uphold the health care law for two reasons: first-if it was going to be 5-4 then Roberts felt an obligation to uphold the law and turned to Justice Holmes, whom he quoted in the opinion, for support: "As between two possible interpretations of a statute, by one of which it would be unconstitutional and by the other valid our plain duty is to adopt that which will save the act. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:54 am
Jonathan Turley highlights Justice Souter writing for the Court (in what is likely his last opinion), showing that he truly understood the core privacy issues: Savana’s subjective expectation of privacy against such a search is inherent in her account of it as embarrassing, frightening, and humiliating. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am by SOG Staff
Fortune reports that Justice Kagan, the Supreme Court’s young techno-savvy Justice, is hip to the jive of link shortening and used a Google-shortened link in her dissent in Utah v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:41 pm by Joseph Tomain
  Justice Stevens, who wrote the majority opinion in Pacifica, dissented in Fox I. [read post]