Search for: "People v Levelle"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 12,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
He begins with a note about labels: “our law punishes people for what they do, not who they are or what they are labeled. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:16 am
This is how people get AIDS. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:48 am
The Report found that “only 15% of the world’s population – or 1 in every 7 people – live in countries where they can seek, receive, or share information freely and safely,” and that the level of democracy has dropped to levels not seen since 1989. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Intellectually dishonest to reject surveys: expect level of perfection from surveys not expected from anything else. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:32 am
NYT v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Heckler v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:25 pm
See the DSM-IV-TR (or the newer DSM-V) and traits from other sources to see what they are, and see how you and your friends rate. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:53 am
Risk with e-cigarettes: people dual-use and keep nicotine levels high. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
While the economic crisis probably explains some of the decline, border apprehension levels had in fact already been decreasing since roughly 2000. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 12:02 pm
Every area of the law has some level of uncertainty. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
Volokh v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important national values or correct various state-level… [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 10:00 am
Activision Publishing, Inc., 2010 WL 1387988, 2 (C.D.Cal. 2010)Very few people on the face of the earth are fascinated by this pingpong between federal and state courts because the decisions rarely make it to the appellate level where law professors and law reviews concentrate their energies. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH v Germany (Case C? [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
Rose v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm
Endorsement by Monroe means something v. different from endorsement by ABG but courts have refused to distinguish those things. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
Khan v. [read post]
