Search for: "People v. Grant" Results 7661 - 7680 of 16,719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Most consumers agree that intellectual property law is essential to ensure that creators of inventions, ideas, designs, services and the like are rewarded for their creativity and to promote the continuation of such creations.[1] In order to grant creators with the incentive to continue creating, such creators must be equipped with the satisfaction of knowing that their creations will not be transformed into cheap imitations which will inevitably compete with their own original creations. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:02 pm by Michael Risch
The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Mayo v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Grant at paras 154-155, 169, as well as in Justice Le Dain’s dissent in R. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You can’t justify IP v. grants or prizes based on efficiency w/o further beliefs, such as beliefs about the dangers & competences of the state. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am by Mark Graber
  Georgia declared implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm v. [read post]