Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 7661 - 7680 of 8,635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Lesson learned from a business survey’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) Speakers discuss technology transfer for climate change; within academic settings (Intellectual Property Watch) The ‘dirty little secret of patents’ is that most are worthless to their owners. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:02 am
Applying the public policy exception in a judicial review arbitration awardsMatter of Amalgamated Transit Union v MTA Bus Co., 2009 NY Slip Op 30877(U), April 16, 2009, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 115102/08, Judge: O. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:25 am
Peter Savel was living with Ashley Shields when she became pregnant and gave birth in June of 2004. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 9:47 am
Segundo o site Info.Com, as vésperas da decisão,   Paulo Coelho solidarizou-se com os donos do site. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 8:14 am
Both require more detailed blogging (which will happen over the weekend), but, to get started . . .Peter Goldberger provides this summary of United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
Katz Technology Licensing drops Covington & Burling as counsel (Law 360) Economic downturn = downturn in patent filings (PatentlyO) Challenging the strong presumption of patent validity (PatentlyO) USPTO Extends patent prosecution highway pilot with Australia and begins pilot with Germany (Patent Docs)   US Patents – Decisions Jury awards Uniloc $388m in patent suit v Microsoft (Law 360) (IP Down Under) CAFC finds for Honda in defending truck bed patent suit by… [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
In a comment to my earlier post on this subject, Peter states that "'Forced' patriotism is a contradiction in terms. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:38 am
Ominously, the government portends that more bad news for Delaughter is on the horizon, stating that other similar acts will be offered at trial pursuant to Rule 404(b) to show that Wilson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:14 am
Supreme Court rejected this kind of "end run" in the IPO Laddering Antitrust Case (Credit Suisse v. [read post]