Search for: "STATE V. POWERS" Results 7661 - 7680 of 41,394
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2019, 3:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Find all of the latest updates at narf.org/nill/bulletins/index.html State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2019.htmlCayuga Nation v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:54 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
It was held that the court should interpret the 2003 Act in accordance with the Framework Decision, and an earlier draft of that decision expressly stated that a prosecutor was a judicial authority. [read post]
7 May 2016, 6:16 pm
Fortunately, as illustrated by a recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in The Sidney and North Saanich Memorial Park Society v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 6:50 pm
United States (1883); Mississippi & Rum River Boom Co. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:08 pm
The United States has lost its moral high ground and "standing" (as well as its soft and hard power) this entire decade. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 11:17 am by Josh Blackman
" Now, the article is not about United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:58 pm by Jeanne Long
In LaFarge Midwest, Inc v Detroit, Nos. 318224, 328284, & 328928, the Court of Appeals held that the statutory language of Mich. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
See paras 23 – 29 of  R (English UK Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1726   for a further explanation of the workings of PBS. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:09 am
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 7:08 am by Christine Corcos
Later, a version of interposition termed “Judicial Federalism” emerged as a constraint on federal legislative power in Printz v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 11:31 am by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Recently, the Supreme Court decided Financial Oversight and Management Bd. for Puerto Rico v. [read post]