Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 8,568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2009, 12:20 pm
In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 4:58 am
As in Bass v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:50 am
It states that Congress found the following: (i) the Treasury Secretary does not have authority to provide exemptions or special rules to particular industries or classes of taxpayers; (ii) the Notice granting 382 relief is inconsistent with Congressional intent and the legal authority of this Notice is doubtful; but (iii) taxpayers should be allowed to rely on the Notice. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 3:39 pm
The case of United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 1:43 pm
This post relates to Tellez v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Louis, IS & M Ry Co v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 10:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:00 am
Multimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:31 am
There was no communication or cooperation among the small group of researchers who were required to work closely together. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
Again, I thank my colleague from Maine for her help and cooperation in introducing this bill. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
School Dist., 42 AD 3d 633 and Brodsky v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 3:27 am
Newell, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
Ninth_Circuit_1905.jpg Former grand jury testimony of cooperating witness should have been presented to the jury under FRE 804(b)(1); Ninth Circuit adopts broad application of "similar motive" requirement, in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 5:36 pm
In Kruska v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:45 am
LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 10:07 am
LLC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
Madoff_B.jpg A cooperation plea agreement would have required his truthful responses concerning the fraud scheme; Madoff plea allocution statement appears to try to limit the exposure of others who may have been involved in his fraud scheme, in United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
See Purdy v. [read post]
