Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 7661 - 7680
of 15,316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2015, 6:57 pm
(c) Unless the testator’s will provides otherwise, a revocation or termination of the trust before the testator’s death causes the devise to lapse. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 6:42 pm
An acknowledgment need not be expressly stated, but can be inferred from the testator’s conduct. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 7:09 am
The term "premises," which was used in Sections 9.b. and 9.c., was not a defined term in the policy. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 6:15 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced an interesting decision regarding copyright levies in the case of Copydan Båndkopi v Nokia Danmark (C‑463/12). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
GOV'T CODE § 22.225(b)(3), (c). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 12:04 pm
GOV'T CODE § 22.225(b)(3), (c). [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 8:22 am
The employee worked for an armored courier company, which operated a fleet of armored vehicles across several states in the Mid-Atlantic region. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
C-14-2020 EMC, 2015 U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
See Chen-Oster v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 5:18 pm
See point 1 above. c. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
Corrections Act § 306(c). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
Corrections Act § 306(c). [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 12:07 pm
In today’s case (Tambosso v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Evid. 801(c)(2)3. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
Evid. 801(c)(2)3. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:52 pm
In Hurwitz v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's patent misuse claim for failure to state a claim. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
Case C-463/12 Copydan BåndkopiTom reports on the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decision in Case C-463/12 Copydan Båndkopi, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Denmark, seeking clarification on key questions relating to the so-called ‘private copying’exception under Article 5(2)(b) of the Information Society Directive 2001/29.* Breakdown in management-staff relations at the European Patent OfficeMerpel has… [read post]
