Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 7661 - 7680 of 9,094
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2010, 5:27 am by SHG
Last year, in District Attorney’s Office v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:11 pm by Business Law Post
As per Nevada Secretary of State’s website, the court system offers “early, comprehensive case management, active judicial participation in settlement, priority for hearing settings to avoid business disruption, and predictability of legal decisions in commercial matters. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am by Bexis
  Here’s why.We recently blogged about new United States Supreme Court certiorari grants of interest. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 7:05 am by Antitrust Today
United States Potato Growers of Idaho Inc., et al., No. 10-CV-307-BLW) and the Northern District of California (Marvilla v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:21 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
 In February of this year, the Federal District Court in Maryland in TEKsystems, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 8:46 am by Kara OBrien
In March, a Massachusetts federal district court ruled in Lawson v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:42 pm
Schwarzenegger, no federal court had invalidated a state law barring same-sex marriage, ever. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:58 pm
There are generally four types of federal records to consider (Congressional, Civil, Military, and Judicial) and at first glance, it may appear daunting. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:36 am by Gary Nitzkin
FIRST, MY ASSESSMENT I refer you to the most thorough single indictment of the fraud in non-judicial foreclosure states like California: Dr. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/63810-6.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals State v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 11:29 am
First, the court stated that agency policy statements, manuals, and enforcement guidelines are not entitled to the force of law. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Gareth
-v- Ainsworth & Anor. [2009] EWCA Civ 1328, summarized in my article “Not so long ago, in a courtroom not so far away…“), but not all Courts agree:  California assumed the personal jurisdiction in Lucasfilm which the Court of Appeal rejected, and more recently the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (on an appeal from the Southern District of New York) suggested, without having to decide, that even the sale of a single item… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:34 am by Anna Christensen
Title 59 Chapter 27 is a content-based tax that violates the First Amendment; and 2) whether that tax passes intermediate scrutiny under United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 5:47 am by David G. Badertscher
Supreme Court's decision this year limiting the extraterritorial application of U.S. securities laws in Morrison v. [read post]