Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 8,253
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 9:56 am
According to Professor Wegner, yesterday, "at the opening of the oral hearing in the Zhejiang High People's Court in Chint v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 11:55 am
By Shannon LandrethOn Monday, in Zoeller v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm
LLC v. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 10:26 am
Holder on Wednesdays, April 22 and April 29, respectively. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda) Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch) France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 12:57 pm
The paper clearly states that it is not the role of the government to mandate how rights are traded or used, but rather to examine how it can facilitate a market space for simpler and easier negotiations to take place, and to encourage rights holders to create business and distribution models that meet the needs of consumers. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
Holder, __ F.3d at __. [read post]
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 Supersedes §22 of the Securities Act of 1933: Katz v. Gerardi
7 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
In Katz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:02 am
The petition for certiorari in Kiyemba v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
EnglishBingoTicket.jpg In copyright action, trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding evidence that copyright holder had engaged in illegal operations (by distributing an online bingo game in violation of state law) since the evidence "might improperly influence the jury to reduce the statutory damages award," in Dream Games of Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 5:06 pm
Holder, No. 01-cv-01854 (D. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
In Gantler v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:23 pm
LLC v W. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:58 am
In another case, however, DoJ declined to change course, and instead adhered to the wrongheaded position of the Bush administration.The other case is District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
Richman pointed us to a federal statute called the Hyde Amendment, which, according to this 2005 Second Circuit opinion in a case called U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Whether one is happy with the state of intellectual property law or not, it seems to have worked as advertised in this case. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 2:09 pm
Mickman v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 12:38 pm
How about the one where he analogizes the conduct here to Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union: "See United States ex rel. [read post]
