Search for: "State v. Long"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 45,804
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
It sued its long-distance carrier, Global Crossing Telecommunciations, and other long distance companies under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 7:05 am
In Matter of Veece v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:21 am
In a recent opinion in People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 3:30 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:20 am
In Segelman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:03 am
Jorgensen to brief and argue Greenlaw v. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
In Wright v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
In Calhoun et al v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Last week, I read United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2008, 11:55 pm
Yesterday in Stormans Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 7:05 am
In Matter of Veece v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 3:23 pm
So, I actually did not read Miklosy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:01 am
Shapero v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:21 am
AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSEUnited States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:49 am
Shanker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 3:35 am
From today's New York Sun:Secret Blogger Seeks ProtectionAn Orthodox Jewish blogger is asking a judge to protect her anonymity from a Long Island elected official who has gone to court to identity the blogger.The elected official, Pamela Greenbaum, a member of the school board for Lawrence, L.I., asked a state judge last month to force Google to identify the writer behind a popular Web log for the orthodox community in the Five Towns area.The blog, orthomom.blogspot.com,… [read post]
24 May 2022, 1:49 pm
District Judge Joanna Seybert in 2017, and confirmed on May 17, 2022 by State Supreme Court Justice Paul Baisley. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 7:30 am
"The Circuit Court said that public officials performing discretionary functions are entitled to qualified immunity barring §1983 claims unless such officials “violated a statutory or constitutional right” and that right “was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the challenged conduct, citing Ricciuti v. [read post]
