Search for: "State v. W"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 15,641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 7:41 am
The court explained that "The doctrine of primary jurisdiction provides that [w]here the courts and an administrative agency have concurrent jurisdiction over a dispute involving issues beyond the conventional experience of judges . . . the court will stay its hand until the agency has applied its expertise to the salient questions," citing Flacke v Onondaga Landfill Sys., 69 NY2d 35. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 9:32 am
’” State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 7:27 am
The Supreme Court released a landmark decision today in the Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 7:22 am
In this regard, precedent from the United States Supreme Court, in Ruckelhaus v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:09 pm
Thanks to Michael’s stewardship, both within the Department of Justice and before the court, “the United States w[on] its point [because] justice was done its citizens in the courts. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm
Ballona Wetlands Land Trust v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
In 1876, Douglass asked, “[W]hat is your enfranchisement? [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:29 am
State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:29 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 9:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
Dublin v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Ct. 2466 (2013), and PLIVA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 9:19 am
Dublin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Richard W. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 12:43 pm
Kirkwood v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 7:23 am
From Tyree B. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
Former employees alleged they were the target of selective prosecution in administrative disciplinary actionBey v New York City Civil Service Commission, Supreme Court, Justice Madden, 2001 NY Slip Op 30058(U), [not officially reported]New York City conducted an investigation to determine which employees were claiming tax-exempt status or were claiming an excessive number of exemptions. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:08 am
In Canada v. [read post]
