Search for: "mark"
Results 7661 - 7680
of 136,118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2018, 6:59 am
In Mark v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:52 pm
You also swear that you own the mark; that no one else has a claim to your mark or a confusingly similar mark; and that the listed first-use date (for a use-based application) is accurate. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:44 am
That is why it was no coincidence when Mark Zuckerberg waited until after Facebook's IPO to get married. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:29 pm
Habeas corpus; Eyewitness marked defendant Due process issue? [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 11:00 am
The Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark BOYD'S for various items of wearing apparel "offered and sold through authorized dealers," finding the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark BOYDS for men's and women's clothing and for related retail services. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 2:02 am
” If the mark is never used as an emblem of authority, but only to identify some service or program provided by a government agency [in Interior the mark was used in connection with recreational and educational services], the mark does not fall within Section 2(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:13 am
In 2015, Brittex petitioned for cancellation of the mark based upon the likelihood of confusion between the two marks. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:05 am
I followed up with Mark after our lunch, and suggested this might be fertile ground for a blog post. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:05 am
I followed up with Mark after our lunch, and suggested this might be fertile ground for a blog post. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 7:33 pm
The two elements of a § 292 false marking claim are (1) marking an unpatented article and (2) intent to deceive the public. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 2:51 pm
Citing the VITAFRUIT decision (Case T-203/02), the Court said:When assessing whether use of the trade mark is genuine, regard must be had to all the facts and circumstances relevant to establishing whether the commercial exploitation of the mark is real, particularly whether such use is viewed as warranted in the economic sector concerned to maintain or create a share in the market for the products or services protected by the mark, the nature of those products or… [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:51 pm
Procedural historythe mark applied for by France.com Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:54 am
Jakks submitted one specimen label bearing the mark (see immediately below). [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" As to the other marks, the term is purely arbitrary.In sum, the Board dubiously found that Applicant's mark is "substantially similar to Opposer's marks. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:52 am
IPKat readers will remember the ongoing battle of Inez and Gus Bodur to steer their Community trade mark application for GOLDEN BALLS through to grant in the teeth of vigorous opposition from the owners of the BALLON'D'OR trade mark (see earlier post here; this decision is under appeal). [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 6:10 pm
" Boxes of "Mark's Quality Meats, Inc., BEEF FOR INDUSTRIAL USE ONLY, BEEF NY STRIPS. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:00 am
It found the mark likely to cause confusion with the registered mark BLACK SHEEP for some of the same clothing items. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:05 am
Let's see how you weather this TTAB storm: Fast Forward opposed Houdini's application to register the mark CLOUDBANKS for wine, on the ground of likelihood of confusion with the registered mark FOGBANK for wine. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:14 am
Line One Laboratories, Inc. petitioned to cancel a registration for the mark IMPULSE for "adult novelty items, namely, vibrators," alleging Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion with its identical mark for "condoms. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:18 am
Opposers claimed that Applicant had admittedly not used the mark on all the goods at the time it filed its use-based application to register, and in fact has never used the mark on some of the goods. [read post]
