Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 10,162
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm
This agreement simplifies state tax systems, removes burdens to interstate commerce that are defined in the United States Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
(IPKat) Amending goods and services specifications: new UK guidance (Class 46) United States US Patent Reform US patent law reform – Swearing-Back: Dealing with colliding filings under HR 1249 (Canada Patent Blog) Manager’s Amendment for H.R. 1249 (Inventive Step) Manager’s amendment for H.R. 1249 – House reverts to Senate inter partes review standard (Patents Post Grant Blog) Fixing the ‘first inventor to file’ one-year grace-period provision of… [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:00 pm
Perhaps, as Geoffrey Robertson QC argued in the Mail Online, a British Bill of Rights is the best way forward? [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.) and Pedersen v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 8:58 am
Disclosure v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:20 am
In McPherson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 10:41 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 2:08 pm
Addressing the e-waste crisis: the need for comprehensive federal e-waste regulation within the United States. 14 Chapman L. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 11:28 am
The Court recently struck a federal law that criminalized, among other things, the sale of dogfighting videos (United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
JUDGE GRIESA 11 CV 2472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:56 am
In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court first noted that it had “repeatedly held that a statute violates the due process clauses of both the Illinois and United States Constitutions if it potentially subjects wholly innocent conduct to criminal penalty without requiring a culpable mental state beyond mere knowledge. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:02 am
This suggests that in such situations the State may attempt to have the case dismissed on the grounds that it immune from suit in federal court for alleged violations of Title VII in view of the rulings by the Supreme Court of the United States in Kimel v Board of Regents, 528 U.S. 62 and Alden v Maine, 527 U.S. 706, cases involving employees suing their state employer in federal court for alleged violations of, respectively, the Age… [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:29 pm
Yesterday's 10 Cir. decision (United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 4:34 pm
Second, in Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:47 am
In United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:20 am
United States, No. 97-334C (Jan. 29, 2010), the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 6:12 pm
Virginia State Bar, 421 US 773 (1975), that the United States Supreme Court found that a bar requirement that attorneys charge clients a minimum flat fee for certain work was unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:22 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 11:51 am
Chevron USA v. [read post]
