Search for: "California Department of Justice" Results 7681 - 7700 of 9,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 8:57 am by Lawrence Taylor
In that landmark case, which has served as a model for other states, the California Supreme Court laid down ways to minimize the intrusions mentioned by the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:46 am by Mark Miller, Associate
  In June, the Court ruled that a police department did not violate an officer’s privacy when it read text messages he had sent on a department-owned pager. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:31 am by buslawblogger
Law.com reports that the Justice Department has tried and convicted the first company, Lindesy Manufacturing, of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm by Christa Culver
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ May 12 conference. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:56 am by Steve Davies
Department of Justice, Environmental & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for the defendants-appellees. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:15 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
  The case was prosecuted by Trial Attorney Ryan Fayhee of the Counterespionage Section in the Justice Department's National Security Division, and Assistant U.S. [read post]
10 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Jaffe of the California Department of Justice, and our moderator, Keri E. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:56 am by Sheppard Mullin
Department of Justice, federal courts and grand jury proceedings, and World Trade Organization (“WTO”), North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”) dispute resolution panels. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:47 am by SHG
  The trick is that the words "prosecutorial misconduct" are no longer what the court found, but what the defendant alleged, a critical distinction because if the court finds prosecutorial misconduct, then the grocery clerk must check it on the list and, wham, bam, the wheels of the Department of Justice start to grind. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:32 pm by Jeralyn
Republicans today blocked the nomination of James Cole as #2 at the Justice Department. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:35 pm
5/9/2011 Guest:  Michael Froomkin Free Expression International More Issues in Free Expression Photo by sheriffmitchell This post is part of "CDT Fellows Focus," a series that presents the views of notable experts on tech policy issues. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:25 pm
The department is also the target of a lawsuit filed by University of Southern California fraternity Theta Xi that claims it faced retaliation after refusing to pay bribes to inspectors. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:25 pm
The department is also the target of a lawsuit filed by University of Southern California fraternity Theta Xi that claims it faced retaliation after refusing to pay bribes to inspectors. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:16 am by Lawrence Solum
I then evaluate Christian Legal Society Chapter of the University of California, Hastings College of Law v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am by Kim Zetter
Although the Justice Department has said the devices are used by investigators “with great frequency,” neither the department nor local law enforcement agencies are required to compile or disclose statistics about their use in the way the Justice Department is required to report annually to Congress on the use of national security letters issued to ISPs and other businesses for customer records. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:50 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Here’s what I suggested in 2009:The Justice Department has to set prosecutorial priorities, as there are more federal crimes on the books than federal prosecutors can ever hope to prosecute. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:33 pm by Brian Petrilla
Department of Justice and various international governmental agencies. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:14 am by Kelly
Does 1-1017 (TorrentFreak) District Court C D California: Cease & desist letter to iTunes isn’t covered by 17 USC 512(f): Red Rock v. [read post]
Justice Department officials issued a second request to take a closer look at the design and vector-graphics illustration products at issue in the complaint. [read post]