Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 32,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2015, 3:02 pm
Improper turn; and, 8.) [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
While the Bill does seek to change the standard of proof against patent applications and patent oppositions from the existing “practically certain to fail” or “clear” type standard to the usual “balance of probabilities (see e.g. items 14 and 15 of Sch 1), no such amendment is proposed for trade mark oppositions. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:37 am
The American Camping Association recommend particular ratios for each age group as follows: Ages 7-8 requires a ratio of 1:6 Ages 9-14 requires a ratio of 1:8 Ages 15-18 requires a ratio 1:10 Do you have references? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 7:15 pm
The arbitration agreement does not waive any claims against the manufacturer. 13. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:54 am
If the rule does not explicitly restrict protected activities, it will only violate Section 8(a)(1) upon a showing that: (1) employees would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity; (2) the rule was promulgated in response to union activity; or (3) the rule has been applied to restrict the exercise of Section 7 rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:28 am
If the rule does not explicitly restrict protected activities, it will only violate Section 8(a)(1) upon a showing that: (1) employees would reasonably construe the language to prohibit Section 7 activity; (2) the rule was promulgated in response to union activity; or (3) the rule has been applied to restrict the exercise of Section 7 rights. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:18 pm
If in doubt, employers should seek legal advice about how to manage employee’s requests for flexible working arrangements. [1] See section 156 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). [2] Family Friendly Working Arrangements [2018] FWCFB 5753. [3] Non-casual employees which have completed 12 months of continuous services with the employer; long-term casual employees which have a reasonable expectation of continuing employment with the employer on a regular and systematic basis –… [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm
/PeterBeinart/status/179562712462921728 (8) https://twitter.com/#! [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
[1] Judicial Diversity: Accelerating Change, page 7 [2] ibid., page 7 [3] ibid., page 5 [4] As of 1 October 2014. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:56 am
” See id., at *5-*8. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
See id., at 8 n.6. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 11:39 am
Work J., 269 (2017). 8. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
App., Nov. 8, 2011). [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:50 am
Id. at 8. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:19 pm
Now, West-Ward has filed its petition for rehearing en banc on the following question*: 1. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:57 pm
”[8] The facts of Guilbeau are straightforward. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:50 pm
The identities of Defendants Does 1-10 are unknown. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 5:24 am
Times, Mar. 1, 2008.4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Glenn Greenwald, Signs of Life from House Democratic Leaders, Salon.com, Mar. 12, 2008.7 Id. 8 Id.9 Pamela Hess, House Democrats Reject Telecom Immunity, The Associated Press, Mar. 11, 2008.10 Siobahn Gorman, House Democrats Defy White House on Spy Program, Wash. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:02 pm
Improper turn; and, 8.) [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
In fact A 113(1) does no such thing. [read post]
