Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V" Results 7681 - 7700 of 12,157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2013, 1:55 pm by Brett Frischmann
To my knowledge, the argument I make does not appear explicitly in the briefs, although Scott Hemphill made a related argument in his 2006 NYU Law Review article, Paying for Delay: Pharmaceutical Patent Settlement as a Regulatory Design Problem. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:55 am by Florian Mueller
I plan to attend the trial and will then report on how the panel of judges over which Judge Andreas Voss ("Voß" in German) presides views Nokia's infringement allegations, and how how HTC and Google try to defend themselves.Nokia does not have any FRAND licensing obligation with respect to VP8 (only with respect to AVC/H.264). [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:27 am by Susan Brenner
Defendant’s Response to United States’ Opposition to Motion to Suppress Evidence, U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Cardozo School of Law) On March 25, 2013, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Amy Howe
  And I am fairly confident it will be reenacted in perpetuity unless . . . a court can say it does not comport with the Constitution. . . . [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:44 am by Ken
But the only information Ingenuity 13 has is the IP address of the Doe Defendant. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]