Search for: "High v State" Results 7681 - 7700 of 35,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2019, 6:33 am by Peter S. Lubin and Patrick Austermuehle
The panel stated that Hardiman was a public figure at the time of the statements, and that, in order to prevail, he was required to show that the defendants knew the statement was false, had a high degree of awareness that the statement was false, or entertained serious doubts about the truth of the statements made. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:12 am by Inga Dyantyi
The January 2024 high court judgment in Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd v Cash Crusaders Franchisees Listed on Annexure ‘ADP1’ to the Founding Affidavit of Andries Daniel Du Plooy (16453/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 11 related to a dispute between Cash Crusaders Franchising (Pty) Ltd and franchisees arising from a systemic change by Cash Crusaders of the rules pertaining to pawn transactions. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 11:05 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
” Campos was referring to Scalia’s concurring, dissenting opinion issued in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:35 pm by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:59 am
That procedure resulted in the very expedited  landmark opinion by the Delaware Supreme Court last month in CA, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2006, 10:23 am by Jeff
Last time I checked (and high school biology was a long, long time ago) it takes two to create a child. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:29 am
It declined to rule that he had met the high burden of proving, by "perfect, complete, and correlative" evidence, not just that the event was staged, but that France 2 and Enderlin had covered up the hoax. [read post]