Search for: "House v. House" Results 7681 - 7700 of 41,242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
Also, abandoning the house for personal use and then trying to sell it shortly thereafter (and claiming it is now held primarily for investment) is likely not sufficient under 1031 (although holding the property for a while after abandoning it for personal use may work...see Moore v CIR (2007)). [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The issue is now to be dealt with by the Parliamentary process known as “ping pong” – with the House of Lords deciding on Monday whether to reinstate the Leveson 2 amendment and send it back to the House of Commons for reconsideration by MPs. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 2:51 pm by Giles Peaker
This was based on Haringey LBC v Hickey(2006) EWCA Civ 373. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 9:56 am by Giles Peaker
Regas, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Enfield [2014] EWHC 4173 (Admin) Mr Regas is a landlord with a single property in Enfield. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 2:50 pm by Dave
 Their argument that s.213A, Housing Act 1996 had changed the relevant principles of law (as expounded in R (Stewart) v LB Wandsworth, LB Lambeth, LB Hammersmith & Fulham [2001] EWHC Admin 709) was also rejected at [47] (not an uninteresting argument though, unlikely to be sufficient to enable them to appeal). [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
The Court will consider when should a mandatory order against a local housing authority be made to enforce a duty owed to a homeless individual under s193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 (the “1996 Act”)? [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:13 pm by zshapiro
At the police station Rabbia gave the officers permission to search his room at his mother’s house. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm by Dennis Crouch
Judge O’Malley wrote an interesting dissent while sitting by designation in Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 1:07 pm by zola.support.team
  The measure goes a step further than the Supreme Court’s ruling (Bostock v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:00 am
An individual’s location, standing alone, does not provide sufficient grounds for a search, pursuant to Terry v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:41 am by Patricia Salkin
Lawrenceville Stakeholders v City of Pittsburgh Zoning Board of Adjustment, 2021 WL 836777 (PA Cmwlth 3/5/2021)     [read post]