Search for: "Individual Does 1-10" Results 7681 - 7700 of 14,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
  As we stated there, focusing on a uniform exemption policy alone does little to further the purpose of Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance inquiry, which requires an assessment of the relationship between individual and common issues. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
Following on from the Case Preview (here), the Supreme Court handed down judgment in Arnold v Britton & Ors on 10 June 2015 in which the appellants’ appeal was dismissed by a majority of 4-1. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 1:58 pm by Nicola Whiteley
If the local Health Protection Team does not get in touch (which is possible, given the pressure they may be under), the employer will need consent from the employee to pro-actively reach out to the HPT because the employee’s health is a matter of privacy for that individual. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 am by Lanigan
Refusing the test does not guarantee you will not be convicted. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm by Bill Heinze
None of these individuals was under Fawley’s control or surveillance. [read post]
13 May 2018, 7:24 am by Parisa Zangeneh
The arms trade does not serve the purpose of peace, nor does it positively impact sustainable economic, social, and political development of any party involved therein. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:33 pm by Sara Xia
One of the conditions for a platform to be determined as a CII is that the platform has more than 10 million registered users or more than 1 million active users. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:37 am by Dennis Crouch
§ 6(b). [6] Following professor John Duffy’s 2007 article on-point, these roles have been tightened-up. http://patentlyo.com/media/docs/2011/10/Duffy.BPAI.pdf. [read post]