Search for: "JAMES V. STATE" Results 7681 - 7700 of 10,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2011, 6:10 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm by Kevin Sheerin
”   ** Although it could be argued that the use of the word “State” limits the negotiation of alternative disciplinary procedures to the State and employee organizations representing State workers, in practice alternatives to statutory disciplinary procedures have been negotiated by political subdivisions of the State and employee organizations representing employees of such political subdivisions for decades. [read post]
30 May 2011, 8:21 am by Viking
Chin University of Arizona James E. [read post]
29 May 2011, 12:01 pm
Central California Judge James V. [read post]
29 May 2011, 11:09 am by George
For example the ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 7.1 states that “a lawyer shall not make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer’s services. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
It is the author's contention, moreover, that it is partly due to the "negative synergy" of judicial usurpation of the amendment processes that genuine amendments are far harder to secure today than when James Madison introduced his original list of twelve proposed amendments in 1789, of which ten promptly received sufficient state resolutions of ratifications to become the Bill of Rights of 1791. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:36 am by Sarnata Reynolds
The Supreme Court struck indefinite detention down as an affront to liberty in Zadvydas v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 9:18 am
The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] that state child protective services workers Bob Camreta and James Alford were entitled to qualified immunity on... [read post]
26 May 2011, 5:52 am
The trickle-down effect of the tribunal’s ruling is expected to place more decision-making power into the hands of private individuals known as locatees who have rights to band lands and want to develop them.Louie, James, Beattie, Joyce v. [read post]