Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 21,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 9:27 am
More Blog Posts: Court Reverses Jury’s Verdict Based on Lack of Evidence Showing the Defendant Knew about Hazard that Caused Plaintiff’s Fall, South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog, published November 27, 2017. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:52 pm
What is remedial and humanitarian about this court’s construction of New York’s minimum wage requirements? [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:24 pm
(Florida’s waiver of sovereign immunity, which spells out the circumstances under which a government or employees can be liable for negligence, is codified in F.S. 768.28.) [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 12:51 pm
(However, the court rejected the CFPB’s request for an award against each defendant and imposed only a single penalty for which the defendants would be jointly and severally liable.) [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
It was an open question whether the right to anonymity continued after a Doe defendant was found liable for a civil claim. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:05 am
The second count, against these same defendants alleged that they are at least liable for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty by other defendants. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
Defendant argued plaintiff’s health insurer only paid $18,300 to satisfy her medical bills, and as a result, the full charges reflected on plaintiff’s bills should be deemed irrelevant and excluded on that basis. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
Morrisons defended the claims on the basis that it could not be held liable, either directly or vicariously, for Mr. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:56 pm
Tree Top successfully defended the claim. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm
First, the claimants in group litigation claim of against Morrisons Supermarket successfully established that the defendant was vicariously liable for a data leak (Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB)). [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:35 am
The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that defendants (home inspector and home inspection franchise) was not liable as a matter of law because while the plaintiff alleged defendant should have warned of building code violations, this was not a building code inspection. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm
One is the rationale that it is unfair to hold corporations liable for wrongdoing because shareholders ultimately end up footing the bill, a view held by Clayton. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:22 pm
Both of these arguments failed at trial, and the school was found liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
A plaintiff was hit by a car as he crossed a street between defendant Grace Family Church and the church’s parking lot. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 10:44 am
A plaintiff was hit by a car as he crossed a street between defendant Grace Family Church and the church’s parking lot. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 9:26 am
However, if the plaintiff can show that the defendant’s conduct increased the dangers involved, or if it obscured the off-site hazards, a defendant may be found liable for injuries occurring off their property. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:01 am
In a judgment handed down today (Various Claimants v Wm Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB))[pdf] the judge held that the defendant supermarket was vicariously liable for Mr Skelton’s data breach. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:15 am
Although the company won the first bellwether trial, it has subsequently continued to lose, with many juries concluding the company liable. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 6:05 am
Board not liable. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:25 am
Let’s look at some examples. [read post]
