Search for: "People v Goode" Results 7681 - 7700 of 20,040
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Comment In many ways unsurprising, this decision confirms that people who choose, voluntarily, to put themselves into the public eye and to accept money provided by the taxpayer, cannot expect a free ride when it comes to transparency. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 3:33 pm by Seth Davis
The federal government used to use three drugs when it executed people. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
These developments fueled progressive hopes of continuing to harness the federal government during peacetime to promote positive benefits for the good of the people. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am by INFORRM
There seems to be no good reason to differentiate between financial remedies proceedings and proceedings under Part IV of the Family Law Act 1996 in terms of the applicable principles. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 3:02 am by SHG
  One out of nine isn't good enough. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:38 am by David Kopel
There was certainly no understanding in 1789 that state power to regulate interstate commerce (e.g., by inspecting goods at ports of entry) included the power to compel individuals to purchase goods in commerce. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:57 am by Charon QC
” As the UKSC Blog notes in their review of The Supreme Court in 2010: Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53. [read post]
Meh
20 Feb 2019, 3:44 pm by Kevin
But most people should consider it. [read post]