Search for: "People v. Commons"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 14,153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2012, 2:22 pm
So you can imagine how keen the legal world was to get the Supreme Court’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:17 pm
All of these fronts in the revolution have several common elements. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:31 am
Although the Keenans performed some work for outside people out of economic necessity, they were not at liberty to work for other kitchen cabinet companies. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:47 am
On June 23, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:47 am
Co. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:55 pm
Wade, for Miranda v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:02 pm
In today’s case (Schray v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm
In 1992, Justice Scalia penned the opinion in Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council in which the Court ruled that regulations which deprive a landowner of “all economically productive or beneficial uses of land” require compensation absent the presence of a “common-law prohibition. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:54 pm
Patent litigation is expensive and the threat of using it can be a way of keeping people off the market. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
It came from here, the What’s Your Price website, where people pay for dates; more attractive people garner higher payouts. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:05 am
Harm is thus equated with people changing their opinion about a telecommunications project. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 8:13 pm
White and Oncale v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
But then again, I don’t think copyright law lets people resell “used” CDs/DVDs if they’ve ripped the files to their computers [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 6:55 am
Many others involve non-related people, friends, sometimes complete strangers moving in together to help ends meet. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 1:49 pm
Cariou v. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:15 am
V). [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
Classic case in UK: Puffin v. [read post]
