Search for: "Smith, Appeal of" Results 7681 - 7700 of 10,334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm by Georgialee Lang
Justice Bouck, who proudly displayed it in the Judge’s Lounge in the courthouse at 800 Smithe Street, Vancouver. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:06 am
Canada (Minister of Transport)  [1992] 1 S.C.R. 3, 88 D.L.R. (4th) 1 at para. 42) - however, I agree with the Court's conclusion in  Smith v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Smith, which strongly reasserted “the necessity of deference to state courts in § 2254(d) habeas cases. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm by Amy Howe
Smith is the first of two granted cases today filed by former acting solicitor general Neal Katyal. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
27 Oct 2012, 3:35 am by SHG
That's the backdrop to the Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Calcagni * Griper Selling Anti-Walmart Items Through CafePress Doesn’t Infringe or Dilute–Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2025, 4:37 am by Weronika Galka
An appeals court yesterday allowed the Justice Department to release Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on Trump’s 2020 election interference efforts but left in place the district court injunction barring Attorney General Merrick Garland from releasing the report until at least Sunday, because the government had not yet appealed that injunction. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit’s reasoning in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Smith-Ribner -- with Judges Dan Pellegrini and Mary Hannah Leavitt concurring -- ruled that the MAJ-owned Club Kama Sutra violated its restaurant permit by providing an area on the premises where patrons could openly engage in sexual activity with one another.Judge Rochelle S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Philadelphia Inquirer (via How Appealing), U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am by Steve Vladeck
Smith, his trial counsel failed to conduct a reasonable mitigation investigation, and therefore violated Ayestas’ Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 9:00 am by Robert Kreisman
On remand, the appellate court directed the trial court to reconsider the issue using the standard adopted from the case of Smith v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 11:51 am by Tessa Shepperson
I report on four more possession cases, one of which we subsequently learn is to go to the Court of Appeal (the Tiensia case). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am by Matrix Law
Byers and others v Saudi National Bank, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 43. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 12:15 pm by Josh Blackman
Eagan (N.D.OK) (Chair), Chief Judge Lavenski Smith (CA8), Judge Jeffrey Howard (CA1), Judge Sidney R. [read post]