Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 7681 - 7700
of 9,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2017, 3:47 pm
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 6:04 am
Senator, a state senator, and a state court judge who reported alleged civil rights violations. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am
The January 16 Opinion In a January 16, 2014 opinion written by District Court Judge James G. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:14 am
In Gillett-Netting v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:18 am
If they cannot agree upon an umpire within 15 days, you or we may request that the choice be made by a judge of a district court of a judicial district where the loss occurred. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
” Wichita County v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:42 am
” In al-Zahrani v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:49 pm
Although the district court decision in Texas v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 7:02 am
In a case known as Commonwealth v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:10 pm
Aurora Loan Services, LLC (pdf) (presently on appeal to the First Circuit Court of Appeals) and other district court bankruptcy decisions. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
District Court Judge Amit Mehta. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am
As the Supreme Court wrote in Davis v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Reversing the district court, the Third Circuit admonished:Federal courts may not engage in judicial activism. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 5:12 pm
The district court in the very similar Solid Oak Sketches v. 2K Games found for the defendants on all three affirmative defenses. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:31 am
The Fourth District stated: "[s]ection [733.106]does not give the trial court unbridled discretion to award fees from any part of the estate. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:25 am
” Wilson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
The present home of the First District Court of Appeal, which recognized the defense of medical necessity in 1991. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) OHIM Board of Appeal rules on functional designs: R 690/2007-3 (Class 99) X5 and CEO Are they still riding side by side – Munich District Court and Turin District Court draw deviating conclusions in design dispute (Class 99) USPTO’s transparency puts Europe to shame (IAM) EU community patent and UPLS: Will there be a political breakthrough soon? [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:05 pm
District Court of Maine denied internet service providers’ (ISP) motion for judgment challenging Maine’s broadband privacy law for violation of federal laws and on grounds of First Amendment and pre-emption claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:33 am
The Supreme Court endorsed this user empowerment tools approach in Reno v. [read post]
